66. “Crater Lake National Park, Management Objectives,” Approved June 10, 1970, United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Crater Lake National Park, Facts and Figures [1974], “Nostalgia” Notebook, Library Collection, Crater Lake National Park.
67. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Crater Lake National Park, Oregon, 1965 (Washington, 1965), pp. 1-31.
68. The long-felt need for better fire protection in the lodge is discussed in Superintendent, Crater Lake to Regional Director, Western Region, December 20, 1965, RG 79, A7631, FRC, Seattle.
69. Hummel to Hauptli, June 28, 1968, RG 79, A13179, Box 2, File No. 13619, FRC, Seattle. The concessioner also agreed to streamline its operations to overcome a series of allegations relating to its inefficient services. See, for example, various complaints concerning park concessions in RG 79, 46953, Box 13, File A3619, FRC, Seattle.
70. Salem Capital Journal, January 15, 1968; “$2 Million Expansion to Add Facilities at Crater Lake National Park Complex,” Grow With Oregon, February 1968, 2; and “Statement for Management, Crater Lake National Park,” November 8, 1977, in U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, General Management Plan, Crater Lake National Park, Oregon, December, 1977, 1-6.
71. “Statement for Management, Crater Lake National Park,” August 1986, Central Files, Crater Lake National Park.
72. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Denver Service Center,Draft Visitor Use Plan, Crater Lake National Park, Oregon, July, 1977, pp. 8, 10, 12. The park also had eleven picnic areas which were frequented by park visitors.
73. Portland Oregonian, November 10, 1978, and “Statement for Management, Crater Lake National Park,” November 8, 1977, in U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, General Management Plan, Crater Lake National Park, Oregon, December, 1977, 1-6. Various environmental groups, among them Friends of the Earth, opposed the sale of the park concession to the Canteen Company of Oregon because of TWA’s role in pressuring the Park Service into reversing a recent decision calling for the removal of unneeded overnight accommodations from Zion and Bryce Canyon national parks. Chuck Williams, National Parks Representative, Friends of the Earth, Washington, D.C., “Additional Note to ‘New House Report Criticizes National Parks Concessions,’ Concessioners Lobby Senate,” March 26, 1976, Friends of the Earth, Northwest Office, Oregon Files, Crater Lake, Box 2, Manuscripts Collection, Henry Suzallo Library, University of Washington, Seattle.
74. Two articles which provide data on the controversy surrounding the lodge during the 1980s are Kimber Craine, “Decaying Crater Lake Lodge Sparks Restoration Battle,”National Parks, LVIII (November-December, 1984), 34, and Gail Wells, “Jewel in the Rough,” Oregon Magazine, XVI (December 1986 – January 1987), 72-73.
75. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Crater Lake National Park Statement for Management, October 1986.
76. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Interim Development Concept Plan, Amendment to the General Management Plan, Crater Lake National Park, Oregon, April 1985, pp. 1-6.
